ELTIF 2.0 Multi-Asset Luxembourg
We do not yet have a NAV series for this fund. Semi-liquid funds often publish their unit prices only monthly or quarterly — and not always publicly.
What the fund does and how the portfolio is put together.
Risk indicator not documented from the key information document (1 = low, 7 = high); it captures liquidity risks only to a limited extent.
Portfolio breakdown
Broken down using semiliquid’s common taxonomy — provider labels are mapped onto shared categories so that funds can be compared. Only published figures are used; nothing is estimated.
The basis is the PRIIPs KID of the share class we track — which makes it comparable across providers.
| Management fee | not documented |
| Total ongoing costs | not documented |
| Entry charge max. | not documented |
| Redemption fee | not documented |
| Performance fee | not documented |
| Hurdle rate | not documented |
| High-water mark | not documented |
How you get into the fund, and on what terms.
Not publicly documented; the provider describes only in general terms the possibility of periodic subscriptions and redemptions ('to invest and withdraw periodically').
Semi-liquid means redemption only on fixed dates, with notice periods and upper limits. This is how it works for this fund — in the order the redemption process runs.
Not documented on a fund-specific basis. Generic market statement in the document: 'you may not be able to redeem your investments other than at specified dates (typically quarterly)'
Not documented on a fund-specific basis. Generic market statement: 'subject to restrictions such as caps on the fund's overall redemptions (typically 5% of the fund's NAV, and subject to the fund manager's discretion). The ELTIF regulations may further limit the level of liquidity on each redemption date.'
not documented
No specific information; the generic note applies: 'investors should expect that these investments to typically have a holding period of 8 or more years'.
Who stands behind the fund, who it is authorised for — and what the figures rest on.
Note (not fund-specific): 'Goldman Sachs Asset Management B.V. ... is authorised and regulated by the Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets ... as an alternative investment fund manager (AIFM)'. Whether GSAM B.V. is the AIFM of this specific ELTIF is NOT apparent from the document
Not documented – no launch date is stated in the document; the only date named: 'Date of first use: March 9, 2026'.
The document itself is marked 'FOR INSTITUTIONAL, CONSULTANT, AND THIRD PARTY DISTRIBUTOR USE ONLY - NOT FOR USE AND/OR DISTRIBUTION TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC'; in France 'FOR PROFESSIONAL USE ONLY'. No statement on the target group of the fund itself
various EU/EEA countries (country pages include Belgium, Finland, Luxembourg)
Not documented in detail. Only the structural framework is known: the ELTIFs are part of the existing 'G-Series' suite, which already comprises six evergreen private markets funds; this is Goldman Sachs' first evergreen product under the ELTIF 2.0 Regulation. The 'G-European Credit ELTIF' announced at the same time is an extension of the European private credit evergreen strategy launched in October 2023 (more than USD 8bn of assets including leverage as at 4 Mar 2026). Whether the ELTIFs are constructed as FEEDERS into the existing G-Series master funds – which would entail double charging – is NOT confirmed in the accessible sources; the wording 'extension of the existing evergreen strategy' suggests such a construction but is not evidence of it. Fee rebate / waiver: not documented
All figures come from our analysis of provider documents (product data as at 19 Aug 2026, distribution data as at 12 Aug 2026) and have not been conclusively verified.
Same asset class, sorted by overlap of sub-strategy — no recommendation, no ranking.