Fund database › Private Equity
Pantheon Ventures · LU2756308701
Part II SICAV Private Equity Luxembourg 4 share classes ↓ Secondaries Co-Investments Buyout
We do not yet have a NAV series for this fund. Semi-liquid funds often publish their unit prices only monthly or quarterly — and not always publicly.
These come from the factsheet, the PRIIPs KID or the monthly report. They may relate to a different reference date, a different share class or a longer period than the series above — the series starts with the first documented unit price, not necessarily with the launch. That is why the values sometimes differ.
| Performance 12M | 13.00% |
| Since launch p.a. | 20.10% |
What the fund does and how the portfolio is put together.
Risk indicator not documented from the key information document (1 = low, 7 = high); it captures liquidity risks only to a limited extent.
Portfolio breakdown
Broken down using semiliquid’s common taxonomy — provider labels are mapped onto shared categories so that funds can be compared. Only published figures are used; nothing is estimated.
Strategy
The basis is the PRIIPs KID of the share class we track — which makes it comparable across providers.
| Management fee | 0.85% |
| Total ongoing costs | not documented |
| Entry charge max. | 0.00% |
| Redemption fee | 2.00% |
| Performance fee | 8.00% |
| Hurdle rate | 5.00% |
| High-water mark | yes |
How you get into the fund, and on what terms.
monthly (typical)
Semi-liquid means redemption only on fixed dates, with notice periods and upper limits. This is how it works for this fund — in the order the redemption process runs.
Units can be redeemed quarterly; notice must be given 30 days before the date; on each date the fund redeems at most 5 % of fund assets; for the first 12 months after subscription no redemption is possible.
The gate caps redemptions at 5 % of fund assets per date. If more investors want out at the same time, orders are scaled back pro rata or deferred to the next date.
From the notice being received to the money reaching your account: typically around 35 to 127 days — depending on how far away the next redemption date is. If the gate bites or redemptions are suspended, it can take considerably longer.
quarterly (typical)
5 % of NAV per quarter
not documented
2 % redemption charge < 12 months
The score measures only the contractual redemption mechanics (the higher, the more flexible) — not whether the fund actually stays liquid under stress. Weightings in per cent.
4 classes known. All cost and risk figures on this page apply to LU2756308701.
| ISIN | Status | Min. investment | Ongoing costs | SRI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LU2756308701 | basis of this page | not documented | not documented | not documented |
| LU2756307729 | documented | not documented | not documented | not documented |
| LU2996223397 | documented | not documented | not documented | not documented |
| LU2996228198 | documented | not documented | not documented | not documented |
Costs, minimum investment and risk can differ markedly by class — check the key information document of the specific class before subscribing.
Who stands behind the fund, who it is authorised for — and what the figures rest on.
AIFM: Pantheon Ventures (Ireland) DAC (regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland); portfolio manager: Pantheon Ventures (UK) LLP (FCA-regulated); depositary and administrator: The Bank of New York Mellon SA/NV (Lux)
7 Mar 2024
Institutional, professional (ex-US)
UK, Hong Kong, Japan, New Zealand, Panama among others
DOUBLE CHARGING IS STRUCTURAL AND BROAD-BASED: PGPE is a classic diversified private equity fund of funds and allocates across ALL FOUR access routes: PRIMARIES (primary fund commitments), LP- AND GP-LED SECONDARIES, direct investments AND co-investments, with a focus on mid-market managers. For the primaries and secondaries portion, management fees and carried interest of the respective GPs arise in addition at target-fund level. The low fund-level fee of 0.85 %/8 % has to be read against this background: Pantheon deliberately positions itself as a low-cost access level above an expensive target-fund level
All figures come from our analysis of provider documents (product data as at 19 Aug 2026, distribution data as at 12 Aug 2026) and have not been conclusively verified.
Same asset class, sorted by overlap of sub-strategy — no recommendation, no ranking.